| 
		THE SIAMESE 
		MINISTER OF EDUCATION, THE PROFESSOR AND THE JOURNALIST 
		A TRIOLOGUE 
		  
		by Gareth Jones 
		  
		May, 1935,  Bangkok, Siam 
		                                                                                                                                            
		 
		They were a curious collection, the three men who sat beneath the vast 
		picture of King Chulalongkorn in a room in the Siamese Ministry of 
		Education at Bangkok.  The first was a Siamese with a forceful 
		personality who considered that he had the mission of forming the Siam 
		of the future, namely Pra Sarasastra Prabhand, the Minister of 
		Education.  He was clad in the old Siamese dress, wearing a purple cloth 
		with one end tucked between the legs so as to form a garb between a 
		shirt and bulging trousers; an unusual dress for one who is a barrister 
		of the Inner Temple.  The second was a learned, religious British 
		professor at Bangkok University and the third a critical Journalist.  
		They had met to discuss the effects of the revolution on the education 
		of Siam. 
		  
		“In the year 2777” began the Minister of Education, but noticing that 
		the Journalist was bewildered, he corrected himself and said: “I beg 
		your pardon, I am reckoning the years in the Siamese way.  I meant 1934 
		we made a vigorous campaign through Siam to drive all children into the 
		schools, with the result that in 2778, I mean 1935, we will have over a 
		million children in schools.  This stress upon education is one of the 
		main pillars of our revolution.  
		  
		“What will the million children learn?’ asked Journalist 
		  
		“Our task is to put the school back into society.  By that I mean that 
		we are not fostering the ‘clerks disease’ and turning every schoolboy 
		into a white-collar worker who is ashamed to soil his hands.  That was a 
		defect of the old regime, when the scholars could not go back to their 
		old society.  We teach the children about nature, about their work.  I 
		have started schools to teach mixed farming.  Our youth must learn how 
		to live in their environment.  Thus we uphold vocational training.”  
		  
		The Professor referred to a talk he had had with a leading man in 
		British Borneo who had said of education in Sarawak.  “I do not even 
		want the natives to learn English for it is no noble ideal for them to 
		go the towns as pen-pushers.  I believe in teaching them about 
		forestry.” 
		  
		The Ministry of Education agreed entirely.  “Educators throughout the 
		world have tended to put the town on a pedestal and to throw acorn on 
		the country.  We hope to reverse that.  I send Siamese teachers who have 
		been to Europe to the provinces of the North in order that they may 
		learn and respect the country.  I want to abolish that snobbishness by 
		which the children who have been trained in Bangkok refuse to go back to 
		the countryside.  I send a number of teachers front the towns into 
		distant villages.  We owe almost all to the country.” 
		  
		The Journalist was reminded of a ta1k he had had in Moscow with Lenin’s 
		widow, Krupskaya, one of the Soviet Union’s leading educationalists.  
		“Krupskaya was a great advocate of sending the townsfolk into the 
		villages to build up a link between town and. country between 
		proletarian and peasant;” he said: “She has plans for building up the 
		New Man in Russia, much as you have the ideal of creating a. finer 
		Siamese population.  I wonder how her Soviet educational plans would 
		compare with the educational plans in Siam.  She believed that loyalty 
		to society should take the place of loyalty to the family and that too 
		much stress had been laid upon the fami1y. 
		  
		The Minister of Education threw up his arms in energetic 
		disagreement.  “The family is the foundation of our education,” 
		he proclaimed. 
		  
		“Lenin’s widow declared the need of basing education upon atheism,” said 
		the journalist.  
		  
		Again the Minister was alarmed by this view.  “A must have faith in 
		religion’ or he can have no faith in himself,” he declared.  “Our 
		Wats (temples and monasteries) are a fine moral training and are good as 
		Eton or Harrow.  Buddhism is at the basis of our education. 
		  
		The Professor spoke: “Just as Christianity builds up good character in 
		the schools of the West, so you believe that Buddhism, will be 
		the foundation of good character in Siam.” 
		  
		The Minister replied: “Yes the two religions are similarly good in their 
		effect on character.  The man influenced by Buddhism will think of 
		others as he thinks of himself.” 
		  
		Here the journalist intervened:  “May I quote a view which I have often 
		heard expressed in the East and ask your opinion? It is this, that 
		Buddhism, by its doctrine that desire and life are evil and. that 
		happiness lies in the absence of desire, has a bad effect on national 
		character, leads to a laissez faire attitude and creates a character 
		which does not strive toward progress.  The belief in reincarnation, I 
		hear causes priests not to help beggars and diseased people for they 
		regard poverty and illness as punishment for misdeeds in former lives.  
		I told also that women have no souls in some Buddhist beliefs and for 
		that reason women do the hard work here.” 
		  
		The Minister pondered: “The Buddhism which we teach. in the 
		schools is an ideal Buddhism and not superstition.  We take the best of 
		Buddhist doctrines, not the whole.  We cannot make: everybody into a 
		Buddha.” 
		  
		The Professor suggested: “You try to conservate rather than 
		abolish desire.  But how,” he added:  “Can you reconcile the Buddhist 
		teachings with the military training which you are driving forward in 
		the schools of Siam?  You have sent native guns and aeroplanes to visit 
		even remote schools and you teach the youth to worship the soldier.” 
		  
		“Military training helps us in our Buddhist teaching.” answered the 
		Minister: “It completes a side untouched by Buddhism.  It gives the 
		child discipline and builds up character” 
		  
		 “A test character of children is the type of hero they admire,” said 
		the Journalist.   “Whom do the young Siamese admire?” 
		The Minister of Education said: “First King Chulalongkorn, the giver of 
		Siamese civilisation.  All comes from him.  But let the Professor as a 
		neutral give his list.” 
		  
		 “Outside Siam my students admire the following most,” stated the 
		Professor.  “First, Louis Pasteur whom they regard as greater than 
		Napoleon; Secondly Lister as a great pioneer of science; thirdly, 
		Florence Nightingale, and fourth, Dr. Reed, the American doctor who 
		discovered how to cure yellow fever.” 
		  
		 “Above all the children to cling to Siamese traditions and to Siamese 
		dress, to revere the past of Siam, and to study the culture of Siam.  
		That is the rope which binds our nation.” 
		  
		    |